"A foreign publisher of my first book [The Selfish Gene (1976)] confessed that he could not sleep for three nights after reading it, so troubled was he by what he saw as its cold, bleak message. Others have asked me how I can bear to get up in the mornings. A teacher from a distant country wrote to me reproachfully that a pupil had come to him in tears after reading the same book, because it had persuaded her that life was empty and purposeless. He advised her not to show the book to any of her friends, for fear of contaminating them with the same nihilistic pessimism. Similar accusations of barren desolation, of promoting an arid and joyless message, are frequently flung at science in general, and it is easy for scientists to play up to them. My colleague Peter Atkins begins his book The Second Law (1984) in this vein:
We are the children of chaos, and the deep structure of change is decay. At root, there is only corruption, and the unstemmable tide of chaos. Gone is purpose; all that is left is direction. this is the bleakness we have to accept as we peer deeply and dispassionately into the heart of the Universe.
But such very proper purging of saccharine false purpose; such laudable tough-mindedness in the debunking of cosmic sentimentality must not be confused with a loss of personal hope. Presumably there is indeed no purpose in the ultimate fate of the cosmos, but do any of us really tie our life's hopes to the ultimate fate of the cosmos anyway? Of course we don't; not if we are sane. Our lives are ruled by all sorts of closer, warmer, human ambitions and perceptions." (Dawkins, Unweaving the Rainbow, p. 9)
Posts tonen met het label Unweaving the Rainbow. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label Unweaving the Rainbow. Alle posts tonen
woensdag 13 augustus 2014
Dawkins' verdeeldheid
maandag 24 februari 2014
Talk to the hand (of nature)
"Genes will spread by reason of pure parasitic effectiveness, as in a virus.
We may think this spreading for the sake of spreading rather futile, but
nature is not interested in our judgements, of futility or of anything else."
(Dawkins 1999, Unweaving the Rainbow, p. 276)
zondag 23 februari 2014
Collectively trolling Dawkins
"A meme is anything that replicates itself from brain to brain, via any available means of copying. It is a matter of dispute whether the resemblance between gene and meme is good scientific poetry or bad. On balance, I still think it is good, although if you look the word up on the worldwide web you'll find plenty of examples of enthusiasts getting carried away and going too far. There even seems to be some kind of religion of the meme starting up - I find it hard to decide whether it is a joke or not." (Dawkins 1999, Unweaving the Rainbow, p. 274)
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)